The Fuckwittery of Modern Economics
Homo Economicus needs a toe up his hole
Well, well, well, isn’t it just a right fucking pain in the arse to be right? Almost a year ago, I predicted that Sir Kid Starver would make a cunt of things.
“Starmer's majority is built on sand - it's a mile wide and an inch deep.”
It pains me to agree with a buffoon of BoJo’s ilk, but thems are, to quote the gimp again, “the breaks”. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, an alumnus of HBOS, and those who follow her lead, including the previous government, have some nerve. Whilst I am not keen to pay more taxes, I am sure that my carrying capacity is greater than that of some poor sod relying on benefits to scrape by. But do you know who has a much larger carrying capacity than I? The wealthy.
On what planet does being a bigger shower bastards than the last set of bastards fly? This is not only politically insane, but also offensive to the idea of common sense. Why target those with no cash to shore up the economy? It is well known who enables the siphoning and hiding of wealth globally. This knowledge is a good news/bad news scenario, though. Good News? Starmer is the PM of the country at the heart of “an empire of tax havens”. Bad news? He clearly has no appetite to do anything about it.
How long will it take for the narrative to shift and for our elected officials to go after the right people instead of beating up disabled folk on behalf of big business? Here’s a fucking novel idea: maybe an economy works better when the people who spend money have money. Just a thought.
Rant over. If you wish to educate yourself further, I recommend the following:
And for those who say taxation is theft:
Rant truly over.